Aug 18 2011

Ron & Jill at Antiques Roadshow!

Published by rtanner under City Life, House Love

Jill and I have tried four times to get into Antiques Roadshow – D.C., Baltimore, Memphis, and Philadelphia – and finally we got into Pittsburgh’s, just last week. You’re allowed to bring 2 items per person for appraisal. We took 3 oil paintings and one old toy. The way it works is that you are assigned a certain time to show up and you can’t show up any earlier than 30 minutes before that time. Then you stand in line outside the main room, where the appraisers and filming are. Before getting in, you wait in a line that’s as long as the typical TSA queue. Then, at last, somebody looks at your stuff to determine which category your stuff fits into. And then you walk inside to your designated category line so that you can see the appraiser. And then you wait even longer to see the appraiser.


The minute we got in line at the convention center, Jill announced, “I’m feeling competitive.” She meant that, seeing other people’s stuff, you start dismissing their aspirations and start telling yourself that you’ve got better stuff and, therefore, stand a better chance of getting on the air. Before arriving at the show, I told myself nothing was going to happen. But I wore a well-pressed dress shirt and chinos — not jeans and a t-shirt – which clearly betrayed my own aspirations. And I started feeling competitive like Jill.


More than a few people were carting in trash — cheap mid-twentieth century furniture and the kind of art you’d see hanging on motel walls and fat, old family Bibles (which the appraisers have told people never to bring). The couple behind us were trundling in an old sewing machine. If you’ve worked in an antiques consignment store, as Jill has, you’d know that old sewing machines are notoriously difficult to get rid of. They were mass produced, are completely useless now, and can’t be re-purposed for anything because of all the hardware they contain. At best, you might use an old sewing machine as an end table. Antiques dealers have learned that you can’t even give away old sewing machines.


There were, of course, some gorgeous things in the room. A couple behind us had a large portrait of a revolutionary war era woman who had been famous in her day. They believed it was circa 1760 and possibly painted by Charles Peale, the famous portrait painter of that time.


We brought two really good paintings and a third that looked good but was possibly a fake. If our paintings didn’t do the trick, I thought our circa 1910 wheeled dog toy might be of interest to an appraiser. It didn’t take us long to see the paintings appraisers. Jill took the two smaller paintings, I took the big one, a circa 1920 portrait of a woman in a black hat.

The show is set up like a spoked wheel. The hub is where the appraisers sit, at long tables. This area is surrounded by high partitions. Those waiting to see the appraisers must wait outside the hub, in their designated lines, where you can’t see anything except other people waiting. It’s kind of dull and not at all the festive atmosphere that the show makes you believe it is. You can talk to the others in line but mostly people are too preoccupied with waiting for their turn – and dreaming of big money and a shot at fleeting fame. The heaviest load everyone carries is hope.


Inside the hub, the lights were bright and we saw lucky people getting their stuff filmed for the show. We also saw some very familiar faces – Jill has a serious crush on Nicholas Dawes and I on Suzanne Perrault, whom we call “Frenchy.” The host – Mark Walberg, the sweet-mannered, empty-headed host – was nowhere to be seen, but it was early yet. No doubt, he’d show up for an hour of taping later in the day.


My appraiser was the Scottish guy, Alisdair Nichol. He asked how much we paid for the portrait. When I told him, “500,” he looked up in surprise and asked, “Are you a collector?”


“No,” I said and then wondered, Should I be a collector?


He elaborated: Did we know something about the painting that would compel us to pay that much?


No, I said, we just liked the look of the painting. We knew nothing about the artist; in fact, we couldn’t read the signature.


To be polite, he said, “Well, I could see why you might pay 500 for the painting.”  He guessed it was British but it could be French. He searched his data base for the artist’s name. He spent a good five to seven minutes doing this.


I glanced around at the other painting appraisers and was struck by how nice they were to each visitor, no matter how crappy the artwork. One woman had brought a huge painting of a matador, clearly something done in the 1960s’ or ‘70s and sold cheap, what Jill calls “furniture store art.”  Anyone half knowledgeable about art would know, at a glance, that it was worth no more than $50. Still, the appraiser gave it a careful going over, even examining the back of the canvas.


Alisdair looked up from his computer and said, “I’ve had no luck. It’s probably Camden school. You could contact a British museum to see if they can place it better.”


He said the painting might fetch $1000. “It’s a little blocky here,” he said, pointing to the woman’s face.


“Here too,” I conceded, pointing to an awkward detail.


I thanked him for his time, then went to see how Jill was faring. One of our small paintings was of great interest, probably Dutch but the artist’s name illegible, so we were at another dead end. This one, too, was worth about $1000, twice what we paid for it but no rare find. Then Jill pulled out the third painting.


She explained that we were suspicious of the painting from the moment we saw it at a Baltimore auction – it’s too clean and it could very well be one of those well-done fakes now coming out of China and Mexico, paintings done in the old style, often on old wood or canvas and framed in era-appropriate frames. But our little painting has a certain charm and looks 150 years old. So we took a gamble and placed a low bid and, to our surprise, won the thing.  We suspected that the frame was a replacement but then, after taking off the paper backing, were curious about the yellowed paper tag underneath – it looked original.


The appraiser examined the back of the painting and said, “You’ve got a good eye. This isn’t original. Why wouldn’t the framer put his name on his own paper tag? The whole idea was to advertise his business, right?”


Apparently the faker had found a generic era-appropriate paper tag.  We had assumed that in re-framing the painting, someone had transferred this old tag from the original frame. But why hadn’t we been smart enough to have thought this through? A tag without any proprietor’s name was useless and highly suspicious.


Then the appraiser noticed that the back of the painting board had been stained to look old — so the painting was a fake through and through and not worth more than the $100 we had paid for it. No wonder so few bidders went after this little charmer. Lesson: if it’s too good to be true, it’s not true.


A few minutes later, as we waited in the toy line, we were kind of glum because our paintings were not so grand. To say that a painting “might bring $1,000″ is not the same as saying “this painting is worth $1000.”

Jill joked that Antiques Roadshow is a field of broken dreams. We noticed that the matador painting had been abandoned near the bathrooms. The couple with the revolutionary war era painting had argued with their appraiser because he said, “This is not by Peale. And this is not eighteenth century.”  Another couple next to us left in a huff because the appraiser valued their print (not a painting, just a print) at $75: “This is a travesty,” one of them said.


The Roadshow brought 6,000 hopefuls to Pittsburgh’s convention center. Of those, we estimated, maybe 100 had something camera worthy. And we were not among those. Which is to admit the sad truth: most of us own junk.


By this time, nearly 1:00 PM, the lines were long. Pity the people whose time is late in the day. The lines just get longer and the appraisers exhausted and the tempers shorter.


When we got to toy appraiser Noel Barrett finally, he looked tired and I felt for him because mostly he had to look at crap like broken pieces from an incomplete game and then two 1950s common toy train cars and then a wind-up of Pluto, the Disney dog, which was missing its ears. When I brought out our 1910 wheeled dog, one of its wheels fell off. Noel stood up it and, to my surprise, the thing stayed upright, even though one of its legs was broken.


“This is a early twentieth century German pull toy,” he announced, wearily. “In good shape it’s worth $200. In this shape, it’s worth a good deal less.”


I smiled and thanked him for his time, then retreated. I had bought this dirty, dilapidated toy dog as a Christmas gift for Jill some years ago and paid nearly $200 for it – because I’d never seen anything like it of this vintage and lots of people were bidding on it.  But now I realized that the toy is a wreck, and it’d cost over $100 to get it fixed and be nowhere near what I’d paid. Now, all I wanted to do was get rid of the thing.


Jill said that a young woman in the line next to ours left in anger after her cigarette paraphernalia collection was valued at less than $100. Oh my, we invest such hope in our little collections! Either we buy them for nothing and think they are treasures or we spend too much on them and think they should be treasures. Either way, they will never be as valued as we think they should.

We saw a couple carrying a 1920s painted colonial revival bench and they were beaming: “In a retail store, this would be worth $1200!” they exclaimed. It didn’t seem to bother them that an auction estimate for the bench ran only $100-200. So here’s the disconnect in the game: Sure, you can place any price tag you want on an item in a “retail setting.” But the auction estimate is where the rubber hits the road. “Good luck getting more than $200 for that at a consignment store,” Jill said sourly. “Did you see one of the legs was chewed up?’


It seemed that many of the appraisers were eager to cushion the blow with these misleading estimates. What’s the harm in telling someone that their mediocre piece of furniture could be priced higher rather than lower? I thought again of Alisdair telling me that our portrait could fetch twice what we paid. There’s a lot of hope in could.


We were not surprised to see only a few people waiting to say something to the camera at the feedback booth. Most people had high-tailed it home, nobody in the mood to shout, “Thank you, Antiques Roadshow!” We gave some feedback and tried to be funny. Jill was tempted to say, “I never realized how much disappointment I’d see at the Roadshow,” but of course she did not.


As we walked back to the car, I said, “The lesson is that condition is everything. Why buy a wrecked toy or compromised painting just because it’s cheap? Go the distance, spend a little more, and get something that’s really good. That’s the lesson.”


“So we’ll sell that old dog,” Jill said.


I was thinking that if I were at an auction right now, I could find something really good – and I’d prove I have a good eye.


But it was late in the day, there were no auctions, and we were hungry. Jill proposed that we find some pizza and I agreed. It would be the best deal of the day.

Tags: antiques, Antiques Roadshow, Pittsburgh

Related posts

One response so far

Jun 30 2010

Antique Hunting & Hoarding

Published by rtanner under City Life, House Love

On Saturday, Jill and I went to yard sales with our friend Scott. Scott is the uber antiques lover and collects vintage Christmas ornaments and decorations. Every time we go out with him — usually to Pennsylvania — he finds something rare and wonderful. The appeal of antique hunting is just that, the hunt. It is a quintessential American pastimes because it underscores our can-do, anythng-goes spirit: who more than Americans can see treasure in trash? And who generates more trash than Americans? Let’s not forget that Antiques Roadshow is the most popular program on PBS.

Some of the most gratifying moments of Roadshow are when somebody has found something very valuable that he/she has retrieved from a Dumpster. Or bought at a yard sale for a dollar. What can any of us buy for one dollar any more? Antique hunting is like prospecting — panning for gold or digging a mine. You get dirty, you waste a lot of time, and, more often than not, you come home only with muddy shoes or a sunburn. But if you get lucky . . . .


It may be a sign of our waning Empire that, in this country, shopping — whether for old stuff or new — is recreation. My ex-wife used to love spending a full day in shopping malls. We once drove to a mega-mall for a weekend of shopping and stayed in the Red Roof Inn next door. I can’t do that any more but I will happily spend a day on the road, driving from yard sale to yard sale. Our friend Scott likes to drive north along Pennsylvania’s Susquehanna River and pass through the many picturesque river towns. On this trip, we came upon a community flea market at a riverside high school. It was our first stop.


It is surprising what people think others will buy. I often see piles of old VHS tapes stacked on sellers’ tables. Cassette tapes too. Battered shoes. Broken vacuum cleaners. CB radios. Rusted chains. Boxes of baby clothes. And a lot of new crap from China. But, every once in a while, I come across somebody who has cleaned out an oldster’s basement or attic. At this flea market, Jill and I were pleased to find some fifty-year-old brass lamp parts and some old tools. I found some old toys too. Scott found a feather tree for one dollar. He was ecstatic.

A feather tree is a 70-100 year-old table-top, artificial Christmas tree designed to display ornaments. Its branches are decorated with feathers dyed to look like spindly pine boughs. It doesn’t look like much but it is rare and, when found in an antiques shop, costs $300+. So there we were, at nine in the morning, and Scott had already scored the find of the day. But, of course, one find just makes you hungry for the next. And here’s where the trouble begins. If you know the market for an item, you may be inclined to pick it up — even if you don’t want it — just to re-sell it. I collect old toys, for instance, and pick them up whenever I find them cheap. But, then, you have to ask yourself, How much am I going to stockpile for resale? Do I collect any and every good deal I  find?


When I watch Antiques Roadshow, I often shake my head in dismay when I hear the appraisers (antiques dealers)  award an item some outlandish value. It’s easy for the dealers to claim a high price when they have a stable of prospective buyers in the highest end of the market (i.e., New York, San Francisco, etc.). But the average Joes and Janes don’t have those connections and they don’t have high-profile auction houses to sell from. Jill and I have tried to sell antiques at our annual yard sale and have discovered that nobody — at a yard sale — wants to pay market value for anything. Why should they?


Which leaves you to sell in an antiques consignment store or on eBay. Antiques stores are closing like speakeasies after the end of Prohibition. It’s not just hard times. It seems that the antique boom has waned. And the demographics are changing. Generations X and Y are buying stuff from the 1950s and 1960s, which aren’t exactly antiques. As for online selling: the good thing about eBay is that it has leveled the market internationally so that nobody can claim something is rare and valuable when in fact it is not. The bad thing is that eBay has glutted the market. Think that little lobby card (advertising the 1959 blockbuster Ben Hur) you found at last week’s yard sale is a treaure? Check out eBay and, guess what, there are fifty of them just like it — listed for $3.99 each.


Scott told us of a friend who has become a hoarder of old stuff. It’s a scary story of how a collection overtakes one’s life. The man in question is has no place to sit in his house because of the piled-high junk and now pays  more on rental space for his treasures than he pays in mortgage for himself. It starts when you keep picking up “bargains” with the thought that you are going to resell them. Notable examples of hoarding include the Collyer brothers in Manhattan, who both died in 1947 buried under mounds of old books, newspapers, and other junk they had amassed for twenty-five years. 130 tons of junk. It fell atop one brother, then the next, trapping both until they died of starvation. The most recent example occurred just a month ago in Chicago, where an elderly couple was rescued from their junk-filled apartment.


Saturday, we came upon an antiques warehouse that was clearly a hoarder’s stash. There was barely room enough to edge yourself down the aisles of junk, which was heaped in piles that, at one time, had been more or less orderly. The good thing was that owner was selling it off, or trying to. There was so much to pick through, we just gave up on the yard sales. We didn’t have time enough to do it justice, though, and promised to come back. As we drove off, Scott observed that the key to sane collecting is that for every item you bring into the house, something else has to leave the house. It’s a yin and yang thing. Jill and I decided that it’s time to sell off our many extras and bargains we have been accumulating in our too-big house. If all else fails, Scott says, just take your treasures to an auctioneer, dump the load for any price, and don’t look back.


Tags: antique dealers, antiques, hoarding, Pennsylvania

Related posts

4 responses so far

Jul 29 2009

London, Part IV: antique hunting

As London sits atop thirty layered feet of its ancient past, Londoners are always digging up stuff–a handful of roman coins, a medieval dolmen, a Druid bog man. “Old” for the Brits is very different than old for us Yanks. So Jill and I were eager to do some serious London antiquing. On Friday, we made the pre-dawn flea market at Bermondsey, just south of the Thames, in the warehouse district–which includes the old leather-tanning district (where, yes, I found a street named “Tanner”). The market wasn’t large but it was interesting. I saw an indenture on sheepskin, dated 1656. I picked up a way-cool little book, published in 1821, titled “The Voyager’s Companion; or Shell Collector’s Pilot with Instructions and Directions where to find the finest Shells; also for preserving the skins of animals; and the Best Methods of Catching and Preserving Insects, &c, &c, &c.” It has a couple of hand-tinted illustrations.

The book seller asked me if I was going to Sunbury on Tuesday. Jill and I looked at each other in surprise. Sunbury? “Oh, yes,” he said. “You’ll have 700 antiques dealers there. Happens every fortnight.” I nearly swooned (not because he said “fortnight”). Jill had to prop me up. Where is this place? We made him repeat, then spell, the name three times. We were not going to miss out on London’s biggest antiques show. Tuesday morning we were up at 3:30 A.M. Now wary of British transit systems (see previous post), we did thorough research and learned that, a) at that hour, we could get to this distant suburb only by bus–actually 3 buses; b) the bus wouldn’t take us all the way; c) there would be some walking; and d) we should give ourselves at least two hours’ travel time. Jill drew a map and took copious notes.

At 6:30 A.M., as the gates of Kempton Race Track–the site of the show–opened, we were among the crowd, most of whom seemed to be antiques dealers themselves, which pleased us immeasurably because it meant we were in for the Real Thing. It was as large as any flea market we’ve been too–three buildings, three large parking lots. Mind you, this was exclusively antiques, not junk. So prices were mostly high. The Brit dealer shares a lot of similarities with the American dealer. They’re a scruffy, wily lot. Theirs is a world of chance and scramble. That makes them edgy. They are itinerant, traveling far and wide for the good find. More than a few look like they live in their vans. Some are charlatans, some are unfit for anything but self-employment. A lot of them are “characters,” like the near-toothless French woman selling jewelry, hoarsely calling her bargains to passersby. Generally, antiques dealers give the impression that little stands between them and ruin.

The exception, of course, are dealers with chi-chi shops, those dark, low- ceilinged floor-creaky places that reek of furniture polish and pretension. Jill and I look at these like museums. We’d rather be in the fields and parking lots with the hard-scrabble gypsies. And so we were at Sunbury. Typical of an English summer, it was raining hard by 10:00, which made me pity the dealers but I figured they were used to it. An hour later, it was sunny. Jill and I showed remarkable restraint until I pointed out a way-cool impressionistic oil painting. She made me pull up AskArt.com on my smart phone for some quick research. Turns out the artist, a nineteenth-century Scot, is “listed.” So we brought home the painting swaddled in a towel, Jill carrying it onto the plane like a baby.

Before leaving London, we visited the Foundling Home museum, which was created in 1729 to take in London’s growing crowds of homeless children. Many single women gave up their children in order to work and, if lucky, get a new start on life. But these women left keepsakes with their children so that, years later, the children could locate their mothers. Or so the mothers hoped. Actually, the Foundling Home administrators collected all the keepsakes and the children never saw them. The museum exhibits several cases of these heartbreaking mementos.

Jill and I got in the habit of eating incredibly rich food for snacks and lunchtime sandwiches. A favorite was chicken liver pate and mushrooms, with some Irish cheddar on “brown bread,” followed by some raspberry-almond tarts. OMG! At our Baltimore Safeway, you can only buy raw chicken liver and it’s none too appetizing: purplish jelly-like organs in a plastic container. Jill became a fan of “cream tea,” which means you get not only the usual kettle of brain-stunning black tea but also a fist-sized heart-clogging scone with a double-rich butter spread called, ominously, “clotted cream.”

One afternoon, while strolling, we encountered a cat and took time to make his acquaintance. I said, “Too bad we don’t have anything to give him.” Jill said, “But we do!” She still had a pastry container with a leftover dollop of clotted cream. That’s how bad we were–there was always something in our bag, either a remnant of a heart-clutching goodie recently consumed or a sweet we’d soon consume with moans of eye-rolling pleasure and nods of confirmation that, my god, life is short and we should live like this every day.

Tags: antiques, antiques dealers, flea market, London

Related posts

Comments Off

Ron Tanner is an award-winning writer of fiction and nonfiction, author of A BED OF NAILS, KISS ME STRANGER, and other works. For more on his latest activity, click here. Or go to: